Life
as we knew it froze in March of 2020. The past year and a half has challenged
us all in many ways. From going to school remotely, to donning masks in public
settings, to our kitchens becoming the office, we have all had to adapt to a
“new normal.” One area heavily impacted was the justice system. Attorneys, judges,
and clients all had to shift to handling courtroom matters via zoom, telephone,
or e-mail correspondence.
As we
begin to see the light at the end of the tunnel for the COVID-19 pandemic,
there’s one common question everyone in the law field is asking, “Are Zoom
court proceedings here to stay?”
Having
spent my entire spring semester of law school online, I will admit it was nice
to wear a suit jacket and pajama pants for Zoom class, especially
Constitutional Law at 8:30AM. I really couldn’t complain about my commute from
the kitchen to my bedroom/classroom, and saving money on gas (and frequent
Starbucks visits) was certainly a plus. However, I definitely missed the
personal element of interacting with classmates, attending office hours with
professors, and studying with other people on campus. I can only imagine what
it must have been like for the court system to transition to a way of life not
previously practiced when dealing with legal matters.
A
benefit that I can see from all of this, is that should any similar situation
like COVID-19 happen in the future, I already have an idea, and some
experience, in navigating the virtual legal world. However, attorneys have
mixed views about the benefits and setbacks of living in a virtual legal world.
This is what Marcie had
to say when I asked her about the pros and cons of conducting legal matters via
Zoom:
“Zoom kept things going during COVID 19—while
we have mediated many claims, in both workers’ compensation and Family law, I
believe that live mediations are more productive, as the parties are more
invested when they have to leave their homes to negotiate.”
“Another con is client
access to a home computer and stable internet access. While you can call in
like a phone call on Zoom, this does not ensure that the connection will be
stable, and without a video, it is hard to know who else is present, if they are
being coached, or if they truly understand the proceeding.”
One of the pros that she
pointed out was, “Zoom has been great for Case Management Conferences as those
are generally short and are not evidentiary hearings. It saves clients significant time and attorney
fees for clients. It also allows attorneys
to be more productive, rather than waiting to be called in to a live hearing,
where often we would wait an hour for a 10 minute CMC.”
And when asked about the
future of Zoom court proceedings she said, “I believe that many simple hearings
(ie. uncontested divorces, non-evidentiary motions) can and will continue to be
conducted by Zoom or telephone.”
A
panel of judges from the district to the appellate level in Tennessee also
weighed in on the pros and cons of virtual litigation. Judge Hurd has found the
transition to a virtual world to be going extremely well and has also allowed
her to preside over more bench trials than ever before due to fewer scheduling
conflicts. Chancellor Lyle agreed with Judge Hurd and said that her experience
has been productive and she even set up a YouTube channel to allow the public
access to court proceedings.
They
did note some of the virtual pitfalls, like keeping jurors off of electronic
devices if they are not physically in the courtroom. They also noted that technological
glitches can slow things down or create communication problems.
Judge
Davis, while appreciating the new way of doing things also noted, “From my
perspective, I really enjoy and prefer the in-person oral argument. It’s a bit
old school of me, but I think there’s something to be said and gained from the
process of being in that courtroom and standing up and walking to that podium
in front of the panel of judges and making your argument.”
While
there are many benefits to a Zoom court lifestyle, it is important to remember
to always be professional as you are still serving and impacting the lives of
your clients even if you’re doing it from the comfort of your home. As their
advocate, they’re counting on you to be ethical, knowledgeable, and prepared.
It’s
hard to say exactly what the future of the legal world and Zoom is, but we can
certainly see how its implementation has helped both attorneys and clients, and
how it has also shed light on areas of the law that are served better
in-person.
And perhaps most importantly, make sure that you are
not showing up to a Zoom court proceeding as a cat. J
Sources:
https://tncourts.gov/news/2021/01/19/judges-discuss-pros-and-cons-virtual-litigation
No comments:
Post a Comment